★
TXElectionResults.com
← 2006 GENERAL ELECTION

Justice, 8th Court of Appeals District, Place 3

⚠ 15
Final Results·75,833 ballots cast
David Wellington ChewI
100.0%75,833
Early vote vs Election Day

David Wellington Chew gained 100.0 percentage points on Election Day.

David Wellington Chew+100.0pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 75,833 (100.0%)
Race totals75,833 ballots
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 75,833 (100.0%)
Menard: no dataHale: no dataArmstrong: no dataCalhoun: no dataClay: no dataOrange: no dataGonzales: no dataFannin: no dataKerr: no dataRefugio: no dataJim Hogg: no dataDimmit: no dataNolan: no dataBrazos: no dataJefferson: no dataBell: no dataBandera: no dataHidalgo: no dataSchleicher: no dataGrayson: no dataCrosby: no dataDelta: no dataZavala: no dataRockwall: no dataEastland: no dataDeWitt: no dataAngelina: no dataMcLennan: no dataLamar: no dataLeon: no dataStonewall: no dataMcMullen: no dataSutton: no dataFort Bend: no dataParker: no dataKinney: no dataFayette: no dataBriscoe: no dataHarrison: no dataReagan: 317 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (317) · 317 net for leaderColeman: no dataOchiltree: no dataCrane: 589 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (589) · 589 net for leaderWashington: no dataLynn: no dataMills: no dataOldham: no dataSabine: no dataHopkins: no dataHouston: no dataBexar: no dataUpton: 257 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (257) · 257 net for leaderErath: no dataRandall: no dataRusk: no dataCoryell: no dataComal: no dataAransas: no dataJack: no dataHemphill: no dataShackelford: no dataSan Jacinto: no dataKendall: no dataWharton: no dataFloyd: no dataKarnes: no dataKaufman: no dataDuval: no dataJohnson: no dataFranklin: no dataEdwards: no dataWaller: no dataMaverick: no dataKleberg: no dataGaines: no dataMartin: no dataBowie: no dataAndrews: 1,363 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (1,363) · 1,363 net for leaderPotter: no dataGarza: no dataCaldwell: no dataParmer: no dataTitus: no dataTerry: no dataFoard: no dataReal: no dataCarson: no dataKnox: no dataHays: no dataMedina: no dataMotley: no dataWichita: no dataMidland: no dataVictoria: no dataTyler: no dataFalls: no dataPresidio: 663 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (663) · 663 net for leaderWillacy: no dataLubbock: no dataHenderson: no dataWalker: no dataGalveston: no dataHarris: no dataDawson: no dataPecos: 1,350 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (1,350) · 1,350 net for leaderNacogdoches: no dataGuadalupe: no dataTarrant: no dataJackson: no dataSwisher: no dataSterling: no dataWinkler: 936 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (936) · 936 net for leaderFrio: no dataLipscomb: no dataCollingsworth: no dataColorado: no dataWise: no dataGlasscock: no dataShelby: no dataComanche: no dataBurnet: no dataGray: no dataHudspeth: 299 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (299) · 299 net for leaderCass: no dataEllis: no dataCooke: no dataWilliamson: no dataCochran: no dataVan Zandt: no dataDonley: no dataJones: no dataGrimes: no dataIrion: no dataNavarro: no dataBrooks: no dataDallam: no dataHunt: no dataMitchell: no dataWood: no dataChildress: no dataJeff Davis: 649 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (649) · 649 net for leaderMontague: no dataBrown: no dataHaskell: no dataFisher: no dataConcho: no dataCoke: no dataPolk: no dataCottle: no dataYoung: no dataLee: no dataCherokee: no dataHall: no dataHood: no dataArcher: no dataBaylor: no dataSan Augustine: no dataMadison: no dataMilam: no dataReeves: 1,368 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (1,368) · 1,368 net for leaderNueces: no dataCamp: no dataFreestone: no dataRunnels: no dataTerrell: 331 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (331) · 331 net for leaderDeaf Smith: no dataMarion: no dataLiberty: no dataJasper: no dataHansford: no dataChambers: no dataHardin: no dataCollin: no dataBrazoria: no dataThrockmorton: no dataBastrop: no dataScurry: no dataEctor: no dataLimestone: no dataDenton: no dataRed River: no dataMatagorda: no dataHardeman: no dataPalo Pinto: no dataLive Oak: no dataSherman: no dataUvalde: no dataBailey: no dataCulberson: 251 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (251) · 251 net for leaderAtascosa: no dataWilson: no dataStarr: no dataDallas: no dataKimble: no dataMcCulloch: no dataCrockett: 569 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (569) · 569 net for leaderHill: no dataKent: no dataEl Paso: 64,055 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (64,055) · 64,055 net for leaderLoving: 39 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (39) · 39 net for leaderDickens: no dataLa Salle: no dataLamb: no dataAustin: no dataHutchinson: no dataVal Verde: no dataSmith: no dataRobertson: no dataGillespie: no dataKing: no dataTom Green: no dataYoakum: no dataSomervell: no dataKenedy: no dataBorden: no dataSan Saba: no dataBurleson: no dataBee: no dataTrinity: no dataCastro: no dataBrewster: 1,549 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (1,549) · 1,549 net for leaderGregg: no dataWard: 1,248 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (1,248) · 1,248 net for leaderWilbarger: no dataHamilton: no dataStephens: no dataLavaca: no dataBosque: no dataGoliad: no dataRoberts: no dataCallahan: no dataRains: no dataMorris: no dataLampasas: no dataUpshur: no dataWheeler: no dataSan Patricio: no dataMoore: no dataWebb: no dataBlanco: no dataNewton: no dataHockley: no dataPanola: no dataAnderson: no dataCameron: no dataMontgomery: no dataLlano: no dataMason: no dataTaylor: no dataHartley: no dataJim Wells: no dataZapata: no dataTravis: no dataHoward: no dataEl PasoAmarilloLubbockOdessaSan AngeloDallasTylerAustinHoustonSan AntonioCorpus ChristiMcAllen
Hue = county leader · Saturation = √(net margin / 90th-pctile county margin), floored
Noted (15)
  • Crossover3.0
    ANDREWS
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 88.3% REP lean
  • Crossover2.9
    WARD
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 81.6% REP lean
  • Crossover2.5
    WINKLER
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 84.5% REP lean
  • Crossover2.0
    PECOS
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 70.4% REP lean
  • Crossover2.0
    CRANE
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 85.2% REP lean
  • Crossover1.7
    CROCKETT
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 76.8% REP lean
  • Crossover1.4
    REAGAN
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 85.2% REP lean
  • Crossover1.3
    UPTON
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 87.3% REP lean
  • Crossover1.2
    TERRELL
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 75.3% REP lean
  • Crossover1.2
    REEVES
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 62.3% REP lean
  • Crossover0.9
    HUDSPETH
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 69.7% REP lean
  • Crossover0.8
    JEFF DAVIS
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 61.4% REP lean
  • Crossover0.5
    LOVING
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 88.3% REP lean
  • Crossover0.5
    BREWSTER
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 54.7% REP lean
  • Crossover0.2
    CULBERSON
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 53.7% REP lean

County results — early vs Election Day

  • ANDREWS1,363 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 1,3631,363
  • BREWSTER1,549 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 1,5491,549
  • CRANE589 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 589589
  • CROCKETT569 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 569569
  • CULBERSON251 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 251251
  • EL PASO64,055 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 64,05564,055
  • HUDSPETH299 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 299299
  • JEFF DAVIS649 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 649649
  • LOVING39 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 3939
  • PECOS1,350 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 1,3501,350
  • PRESIDIO663 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 663663
  • REAGAN317 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 317317
  • REEVES1,368 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 1,3681,368
  • TERRELL331 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 331331
  • UPTON257 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 257257
  • WARD1,248 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 1,2481,248
  • WINKLER936 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 936936
← Back to 2006 GENERAL ELECTION