★
TXElectionResults.com
← 2008 GENERAL ELECTION

Chief Justice, 8th Court of Appeals District

⚠ 14
Final Results·154,882 ballots cast
David Wellington ChewI
100.0%154,882
Early vote vs Election Day

David Wellington Chew gained 100.0 percentage points on Election Day.

David Wellington Chew+100.0pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 154,882 (100.0%)
Race totals154,882 ballots
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 154,882 (100.0%)
Menard: no dataHale: no dataArmstrong: no dataCalhoun: no dataClay: no dataOrange: no dataGonzales: no dataFannin: no dataKerr: no dataRefugio: no dataJim Hogg: no dataDimmit: no dataNolan: no dataBrazos: no dataJefferson: no dataBell: no dataBandera: no dataHidalgo: no dataSchleicher: no dataGrayson: no dataCrosby: no dataDelta: no dataZavala: no dataRockwall: no dataEastland: no dataDeWitt: no dataAngelina: no dataMcLennan: no dataLamar: no dataLeon: no dataStonewall: no dataMcMullen: no dataSutton: no dataFort Bend: no dataParker: no dataKinney: no dataFayette: no dataBriscoe: no dataHarrison: no dataReagan: 422 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (422) · 422 net for leaderColeman: no dataOchiltree: no dataCrane: 729 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (729) · 729 net for leaderWashington: no dataLynn: no dataMills: no dataOldham: no dataSabine: no dataHopkins: no dataHouston: no dataBexar: no dataUpton: 509 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (509) · 509 net for leaderErath: no dataRandall: no dataRusk: no dataCoryell: no dataComal: no dataAransas: no dataJack: no dataHemphill: no dataShackelford: no dataSan Jacinto: no dataKendall: no dataWharton: no dataFloyd: no dataKarnes: no dataKaufman: no dataDuval: no dataJohnson: no dataFranklin: no dataEdwards: no dataWaller: no dataMaverick: no dataKleberg: no dataGaines: no dataMartin: no dataBowie: no dataAndrews: 1,977 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (1,977) · 1,977 net for leaderPotter: no dataGarza: no dataCaldwell: no dataParmer: no dataTitus: no dataTerry: no dataFoard: no dataReal: no dataCarson: no dataKnox: no dataHays: no dataMedina: no dataMotley: no dataWichita: no dataMidland: no dataVictoria: no dataTyler: no dataFalls: no dataPresidio: 1,125 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (1,125) · 1,125 net for leaderWillacy: no dataLubbock: no dataHenderson: no dataWalker: no dataGalveston: no dataHarris: no dataDawson: no dataPecos: 2,386 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (2,386) · 2,386 net for leaderNacogdoches: no dataGuadalupe: no dataTarrant: no dataJackson: no dataSwisher: no dataSterling: no dataWinkler: 1,003 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (1,003) · 1,003 net for leaderFrio: no dataLipscomb: no dataCollingsworth: no dataColorado: no dataWise: no dataGlasscock: no dataShelby: no dataComanche: no dataBurnet: no dataGray: no dataHudspeth: no dataCass: no dataEllis: no dataCooke: no dataWilliamson: no dataCochran: no dataVan Zandt: no dataDonley: no dataJones: no dataGrimes: no dataIrion: no dataNavarro: no dataBrooks: no dataDallam: no dataHunt: no dataMitchell: no dataWood: no dataChildress: no dataJeff Davis: 703 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (703) · 703 net for leaderMontague: no dataBrown: no dataHaskell: no dataFisher: no dataConcho: no dataCoke: no dataPolk: no dataCottle: no dataYoung: no dataLee: no dataCherokee: no dataHall: no dataHood: no dataArcher: no dataBaylor: no dataSan Augustine: no dataMadison: no dataMilam: no dataReeves: 1,973 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (1,973) · 1,973 net for leaderNueces: no dataCamp: no dataFreestone: no dataRunnels: no dataTerrell: 296 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (296) · 296 net for leaderDeaf Smith: no dataMarion: no dataLiberty: no dataJasper: no dataHansford: no dataChambers: no dataHardin: no dataCollin: no dataBrazoria: no dataThrockmorton: no dataBastrop: no dataScurry: no dataEctor: no dataLimestone: no dataDenton: no dataRed River: no dataMatagorda: no dataHardeman: no dataPalo Pinto: no dataLive Oak: no dataSherman: no dataUvalde: no dataBailey: no dataCulberson: 474 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (474) · 474 net for leaderAtascosa: no dataWilson: no dataStarr: no dataDallas: no dataKimble: no dataMcCulloch: no dataCrockett: 833 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (833) · 833 net for leaderHill: no dataKent: no dataEl Paso: 137,978 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (137,978) · 137,978 net for leaderLoving: 38 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (38) · 38 net for leaderDickens: no dataLa Salle: no dataLamb: no dataAustin: no dataHutchinson: no dataVal Verde: no dataSmith: no dataRobertson: no dataGillespie: no dataKing: no dataTom Green: no dataYoakum: no dataSomervell: no dataKenedy: no dataBorden: no dataSan Saba: no dataBurleson: no dataBee: no dataTrinity: no dataCastro: no dataBrewster: 2,404 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (2,404) · 2,404 net for leaderGregg: no dataWard: 2,032 votes · David Wellington Chew 100.0% (2,032) · 2,032 net for leaderWilbarger: no dataHamilton: no dataStephens: no dataLavaca: no dataBosque: no dataGoliad: no dataRoberts: no dataCallahan: no dataRains: no dataMorris: no dataLampasas: no dataUpshur: no dataWheeler: no dataSan Patricio: no dataMoore: no dataWebb: no dataBlanco: no dataNewton: no dataHockley: no dataPanola: no dataAnderson: no dataCameron: no dataMontgomery: no dataLlano: no dataMason: no dataTaylor: no dataHartley: no dataJim Wells: no dataZapata: no dataTravis: no dataHoward: no dataEl PasoAmarilloLubbockOdessaSan AngeloDallasTylerAustinHoustonSan AntonioCorpus ChristiMcAllen
Hue = county leader · Saturation = √(net margin / 90th-pctile county margin), floored
Noted (14)
  • Crossover3.6
    WARD
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 81.6% REP lean
  • Crossover3.6
    ANDREWS
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 88.3% REP lean
  • Crossover2.7
    PECOS
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 70.4% REP lean
  • Crossover2.6
    WINKLER
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 84.5% REP lean
  • Crossover2.2
    CRANE
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 85.2% REP lean
  • Crossover2.1
    CROCKETT
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 76.8% REP lean
  • Crossover1.8
    UPTON
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 87.3% REP lean
  • Crossover1.7
    REAGAN
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 85.2% REP lean
  • Crossover1.5
    REEVES
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 62.3% REP lean
  • Crossover1.2
    TERRELL
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 75.3% REP lean
  • Crossover0.8
    JEFF DAVIS
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 61.4% REP lean
  • Crossover0.6
    BREWSTER
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 54.7% REP lean
  • Crossover0.5
    LOVING
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 88.3% REP lean
  • Crossover0.2
    CULBERSON
    David Wellington Chew (DEM) won a county with 53.7% REP lean

County results — early vs Election Day

  • ANDREWS1,977 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 1,9771,977
  • BREWSTER2,404 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 2,4042,404
  • CRANE729 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 729729
  • CROCKETT833 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 833833
  • CULBERSON474 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 474474
  • EL PASO137,978 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 137,978137,978
  • HUDSPETH0 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 00
  • JEFF DAVIS703 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 703703
  • LOVING38 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 3838
  • PECOS2,386 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 2,3862,386
  • PRESIDIO1,125 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 1,1251,125
  • REAGAN422 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 422422
  • REEVES1,973 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 1,9731,973
  • TERRELL296 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 296296
  • UPTON509 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 509509
  • WARD2,032 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 2,0322,032
  • WINKLER1,003 total
    ChewEarly 0 · E-day 1,0031,003
← Back to 2008 GENERAL ELECTION