State Representative District 88
Final Results·39,941 ballots cast
Ken King
100.0%39,941
Early vote vs Election Day
Ken King gained 100.0 percentage points on Election Day.
Ken King+100.0pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 39,941 (100.0%)
Race totals39,941 ballots
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 39,941 (100.0%)
Hue = county leader · Saturation = √(net margin / 90th-pctile county margin), floored
Nothing noted.
County results — early vs Election Day
| County | King | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early | E-day | Total | ||
| ARMSTRONG | 0 | 816 | 816 | 816 |
| BAILEY | 0 | 1,439 | 1,439 | 1,439 |
| BRISCOE | 0 | 524 | 524 | 524 |
| CASTRO | 0 | 1,515 | 1,515 | 1,515 |
| COCHRAN | 0 | 729 | 729 | 729 |
| DONLEY | 0 | 1,334 | 1,334 | 1,334 |
| GRAY | 0 | 6,605 | 6,605 | 6,605 |
| HALE | 0 | 7,088 | 7,088 | 7,088 |
| HANSFORD | 0 | 1,741 | 1,741 | 1,741 |
| HEMPHILL | 0 | 1,262 | 1,262 | 1,262 |
| HOCKLEY | 0 | 5,925 | 5,925 | 5,925 |
| LAMB | 0 | 3,288 | 3,288 | 3,288 |
| LIPSCOMB | 0 | 1,049 | 1,049 | 1,049 |
| OCHILTREE | 0 | 2,715 | 2,715 | 2,715 |
| ROBERTS | 0 | 469 | 469 | 469 |
| SWISHER | 0 | 1,672 | 1,672 | 1,672 |
| YOAKUM | 0 | 1,770 | 1,770 | 1,770 |
- ARMSTRONG816 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 816816
- BAILEY1,439 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 1,4391,439
- BRISCOE524 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 524524
- CASTRO1,515 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 1,5151,515
- COCHRAN729 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 729729
- DONLEY1,334 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 1,3341,334
- GRAY6,605 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 6,6056,605
- HALE7,088 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 7,0887,088
- HANSFORD1,741 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 1,7411,741
- HEMPHILL1,262 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 1,2621,262
- HOCKLEY5,925 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 5,9255,925
- LAMB3,288 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 3,2883,288
- LIPSCOMB1,049 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 1,0491,049
- OCHILTREE2,715 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 2,7152,715
- ROBERTS469 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 469469
- SWISHER1,672 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 1,6721,672
- YOAKUM1,770 totalKingEarly 0 · E-day 1,7701,770