★
TXElectionResults.com
← 2012 REPUBLICAN PARTY PRIMARY ELECTION

State Representative District 68

⚠ 12Runoff
RepublicanFinal Results·18,827 ballots cast
Trent McKnight
49.0%9,226
Drew Springer
34.5%6,498
David Isbell
9.8%1,842
Paul Braswell
6.7%1,261
Early vote vs Election Day

Trent McKnight gained 49.0 percentage points on Election Day.

Trent McKnight+49.0pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 9,226 (100.0%)
Drew Springer+34.5pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 6,498 (100.0%)
David Isbell+9.8pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 1,842 (100.0%)
Paul Braswell+6.7pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 1,261 (100.0%)
Race totals18,827 ballots
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 18,827 (100.0%)
Menard: no dataHale: no dataArmstrong: no dataCalhoun: no dataClay: no dataOrange: no dataGonzales: no dataFannin: no dataKerr: no dataRefugio: no dataJim Hogg: no dataDimmit: no dataNolan: no dataBrazos: no dataJefferson: no dataBell: no dataBandera: no dataHidalgo: no dataSchleicher: no dataGrayson: no dataCrosby: 380 votes · Trent McKnight 56.1% (213) · Drew Springer 21.8% (83) · David Isbell 14.2% (54) · Paul Braswell 7.9% (30) · 130 net for leaderDelta: no dataZavala: no dataRockwall: no dataEastland: no dataDeWitt: no dataAngelina: no dataMcLennan: no dataLamar: no dataLeon: no dataStonewall: 70 votes · Trent McKnight 67.1% (47) · Drew Springer 27.1% (19) · David Isbell 2.9% (2) · Paul Braswell 2.9% (2) · 28 net for leaderMcMullen: no dataSutton: no dataFort Bend: no dataParker: no dataKinney: no dataFayette: no dataBriscoe: no dataHarrison: no dataReagan: no dataColeman: no dataOchiltree: no dataCrane: no dataWashington: no dataLynn: no dataMills: no dataOldham: no dataSabine: no dataHopkins: no dataHouston: no dataBexar: no dataUpton: no dataErath: no dataRandall: no dataRusk: no dataCoryell: no dataComal: no dataAransas: no dataJack: 710 votes · Trent McKnight 54.4% (386) · Drew Springer 29.0% (206) · David Isbell 9.3% (66) · Paul Braswell 7.3% (52) · 180 net for leaderHemphill: no dataShackelford: no dataSan Jacinto: no dataKendall: no dataWharton: no dataFloyd: 681 votes · Trent McKnight 52.7% (359) · Drew Springer 33.2% (226) · David Isbell 4.1% (28) · Paul Braswell 10.0% (68) · 133 net for leaderKarnes: no dataKaufman: no dataDuval: no dataJohnson: no dataFranklin: no dataEdwards: no dataWaller: no dataMaverick: no dataKleberg: no dataGaines: no dataMartin: no dataBowie: no dataAndrews: no dataPotter: no dataGarza: 769 votes · Trent McKnight 58.1% (447) · Drew Springer 26.4% (203) · David Isbell 11.4% (88) · Paul Braswell 4.0% (31) · 244 net for leaderCaldwell: no dataParmer: no dataTitus: no dataTerry: no dataFoard: no dataReal: no dataCarson: no dataKnox: no dataHays: no dataMedina: no dataMotley: 237 votes · Trent McKnight 64.6% (153) · Drew Springer 26.6% (63) · David Isbell 3.0% (7) · Paul Braswell 5.9% (14) · 90 net for leaderWichita: no dataMidland: no dataVictoria: no dataTyler: no dataFalls: no dataPresidio: no dataWillacy: no dataLubbock: no dataHenderson: no dataWalker: no dataGalveston: no dataHarris: no dataDawson: no dataPecos: no dataNacogdoches: no dataGuadalupe: no dataTarrant: no dataJackson: no dataSwisher: no dataSterling: no dataWinkler: no dataFrio: no dataLipscomb: no dataCollingsworth: 240 votes · Trent McKnight 75.0% (180) · Drew Springer 17.9% (43) · David Isbell 3.3% (8) · Paul Braswell 3.8% (9) · 137 net for leaderColorado: no dataWise: no dataGlasscock: no dataShelby: no dataComanche: no dataBurnet: no dataGray: no dataHudspeth: no dataCass: no dataEllis: no dataCooke: 5,148 votes · Trent McKnight 22.7% (1,167) · Drew Springer 57.8% (2,974) · David Isbell 15.6% (804) · Paul Braswell 3.9% (203) · 1,807 net for leaderWilliamson: no dataCochran: no dataVan Zandt: no dataDonley: no dataJones: no dataGrimes: no dataIrion: no dataNavarro: no dataBrooks: no dataDallam: no dataHunt: no dataMitchell: no dataWood: no dataChildress: 654 votes · Trent McKnight 66.8% (437) · Drew Springer 20.6% (135) · David Isbell 6.1% (40) · Paul Braswell 6.4% (42) · 302 net for leaderJeff Davis: no dataMontague: 3,315 votes · Trent McKnight 41.3% (1,369) · Drew Springer 34.6% (1,146) · David Isbell 8.4% (279) · Paul Braswell 15.7% (521) · 223 net for leaderBrown: no dataHaskell: 180 votes · Trent McKnight 80.0% (144) · Drew Springer 10.6% (19) · David Isbell 3.3% (6) · Paul Braswell 6.1% (11) · 125 net for leaderFisher: 106 votes · Trent McKnight 63.2% (67) · Drew Springer 17.0% (18) · David Isbell 3.8% (4) · Paul Braswell 16.0% (17) · 49 net for leaderConcho: no dataCoke: no dataPolk: no dataCottle: 202 votes · Trent McKnight 68.8% (139) · Drew Springer 8.4% (17) · David Isbell 13.4% (27) · Paul Braswell 9.4% (19) · 112 net for leaderYoung: 2,580 votes · Trent McKnight 62.7% (1,617) · Drew Springer 26.6% (686) · David Isbell 7.6% (197) · Paul Braswell 3.1% (80) · 931 net for leaderLee: no dataCherokee: no dataHall: 156 votes · Trent McKnight 86.5% (135) · Drew Springer 5.1% (8) · David Isbell 6.4% (10) · Paul Braswell 1.9% (3) · 125 net for leaderHood: no dataArcher: no dataBaylor: no dataSan Augustine: no dataMadison: no dataMilam: no dataReeves: no dataNueces: no dataCamp: no dataFreestone: no dataRunnels: no dataTerrell: no dataDeaf Smith: no dataMarion: no dataLiberty: no dataJasper: no dataHansford: no dataChambers: no dataHardin: no dataCollin: no dataBrazoria: no dataThrockmorton: 747 votes · Trent McKnight 87.7% (655) · Drew Springer 5.2% (39) · David Isbell 4.1% (31) · Paul Braswell 2.9% (22) · 616 net for leaderBastrop: no dataScurry: no dataEctor: no dataLimestone: no dataDenton: no dataRed River: no dataMatagorda: no dataHardeman: 236 votes · Trent McKnight 72.9% (172) · Drew Springer 21.2% (50) · David Isbell 3.4% (8) · Paul Braswell 2.5% (6) · 122 net for leaderPalo Pinto: no dataLive Oak: no dataSherman: no dataUvalde: no dataBailey: no dataCulberson: no dataAtascosa: no dataWilson: no dataStarr: no dataDallas: no dataKimble: no dataMcCulloch: no dataCrockett: no dataHill: no dataKent: 70 votes · Trent McKnight 85.7% (60) · Drew Springer 11.4% (8) · David Isbell 1.4% (1) · Paul Braswell 1.4% (1) · 52 net for leaderEl Paso: no dataLoving: no dataDickens: 278 votes · Trent McKnight 74.8% (208) · Drew Springer 14.4% (40) · David Isbell 5.8% (16) · Paul Braswell 5.0% (14) · 168 net for leaderLa Salle: no dataLamb: no dataAustin: no dataHutchinson: no dataVal Verde: no dataSmith: no dataRobertson: no dataGillespie: no dataKing: 51 votes · Trent McKnight 52.9% (27) · Drew Springer 31.4% (16) · David Isbell 7.8% (4) · Paul Braswell 7.8% (4) · 11 net for leaderTom Green: no dataYoakum: no dataSomervell: no dataKenedy: no dataBorden: no dataSan Saba: no dataBurleson: no dataBee: no dataTrinity: no dataCastro: no dataBrewster: no dataGregg: no dataWard: no dataWilbarger: 820 votes · Trent McKnight 69.3% (568) · Drew Springer 17.0% (139) · David Isbell 10.5% (86) · Paul Braswell 3.3% (27) · 429 net for leaderHamilton: no dataStephens: no dataLavaca: no dataBosque: no dataGoliad: no dataRoberts: no dataCallahan: no dataRains: no dataMorris: no dataLampasas: no dataUpshur: no dataWheeler: 1,197 votes · Trent McKnight 56.5% (676) · Drew Springer 30.1% (360) · David Isbell 6.3% (76) · Paul Braswell 7.1% (85) · 316 net for leaderSan Patricio: no dataMoore: no dataWebb: no dataBlanco: no dataNewton: no dataHockley: no dataPanola: no dataAnderson: no dataCameron: no dataMontgomery: no dataLlano: no dataMason: no dataTaylor: no dataHartley: no dataJim Wells: no dataZapata: no dataTravis: no dataHoward: no dataEl PasoAmarilloLubbockOdessaSan AngeloDallasTylerAustinHoustonSan AntonioCorpus ChristiMcAllen
Hue = county leader · Saturation = √(net margin / 90th-pctile county margin), floored
Noted (12)
  • Underperform4.1
    COOKE
    Trent McKnight's margin -35.1pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide1.7
    THROCKMORTON
    Trent McKnight won by +82.5pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide1.0
    WILBARGER
    Trent McKnight won by +52.3pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide0.8
    HALL
    Trent McKnight won by +80.1pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide0.7
    CHILDRESS
    Trent McKnight won by +46.2pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide0.7
    DICKENS
    Trent McKnight won by +60.4pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide0.7
    HASKELL
    Trent McKnight won by +69.4pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide0.6
    COLLINGSWORTH
    Trent McKnight won by +57.1pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide0.5
    COTTLE
    Trent McKnight won by +55.4pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide0.5
    HARDEMAN
    Trent McKnight won by +51.7pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide0.5
    KENT
    Trent McKnight won by +74.3pp vs statewide +14.5pp
  • Landslide0.3
    FISHER
    Trent McKnight won by +46.2pp vs statewide +14.5pp

County results — early vs Election Day

  • CHILDRESS654 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 437437
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 135135
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 4040
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 4242
  • COLLINGSWORTH240 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 180180
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 4343
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 88
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 99
  • COOKE5,148 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 1,1671,167
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 2,9742,974
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 804804
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 203203
  • COTTLE202 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 139139
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 1717
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 2727
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 1919
  • CROSBY380 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 213213
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 8383
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 5454
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 3030
  • DICKENS278 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 208208
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 4040
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 1616
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 1414
  • FISHER106 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 6767
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 1818
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 44
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 1717
  • FLOYD681 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 359359
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 226226
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 2828
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 6868
  • GARZA769 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 447447
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 203203
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 8888
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 3131
  • HALL156 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 135135
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 88
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 1010
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 33
  • HARDEMAN236 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 172172
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 5050
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 88
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 66
  • HASKELL180 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 144144
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 1919
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 66
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 1111
  • JACK710 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 386386
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 206206
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 6666
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 5252
  • KENT70 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 6060
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 88
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 11
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 11
  • KING51 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 2727
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 1616
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 44
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 44
  • MONTAGUE3,315 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 1,3691,369
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 1,1461,146
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 279279
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 521521
  • MOTLEY237 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 153153
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 6363
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 77
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 1414
  • STONEWALL70 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 4747
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 1919
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 22
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 22
  • THROCKMORTON747 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 655655
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 3939
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 3131
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 2222
  • WHEELER1,197 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 676676
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 360360
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 7676
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 8585
  • WILBARGER820 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 568568
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 139139
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 8686
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 2727
  • YOUNG2,580 total
    McKnightEarly 0 · E-day 1,6171,617
    SpringerEarly 0 · E-day 686686
    IsbellEarly 0 · E-day 197197
    BraswellEarly 0 · E-day 8080
← Back to 2012 REPUBLICAN PARTY PRIMARY ELECTION