Justice, 1st Court of Appeals District, Place 2

8
Final Results·1,730,168 ballots cast
Gordon Goodman
50.9%881,091
Jane BlandI
49.1%849,077
Early vote vs Election Day

Gordon Goodman gained 50.9 percentage points on Election Day.

Gordon Goodman+50.9pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 881,091 (100.0%)
Jane Bland+49.1pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 849,077 (100.0%)
Race totals1,730,168 ballots
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 1,730,168 (100.0%)
Menard: no dataHale: no dataArmstrong: no dataCalhoun: no dataClay: no dataOrange: no dataGonzales: no dataFannin: no dataKerr: no dataRefugio: no dataJim Hogg: no dataDimmit: no dataNolan: no dataBrazos: no dataJefferson: no dataBell: no dataBandera: no dataHidalgo: no dataSchleicher: no dataGrayson: no dataCrosby: no dataDelta: no dataZavala: no dataRockwall: no dataEastland: no dataDeWitt: no dataAngelina: no dataMcLennan: no dataLamar: no dataLeon: no dataStonewall: no dataMcMullen: no dataSutton: no dataFort Bend: 250,763 votes · Jane Bland 47.2% (118,360) · Gordon Goodman 52.8% (132,403) · 14,043 net for leaderParker: no dataKinney: no dataFayette: no dataBriscoe: no dataHarrison: no dataReagan: no dataColeman: no dataOchiltree: no dataCrane: no dataWashington: 13,102 votes · Jane Bland 77.5% (10,153) · Gordon Goodman 22.5% (2,949) · 7,204 net for leaderLynn: no dataMills: no dataOldham: no dataSabine: no dataHopkins: no dataHouston: no dataBexar: no dataUpton: no dataErath: no dataRandall: no dataRusk: no dataCoryell: no dataComal: no dataAransas: no dataJack: no dataHemphill: no dataShackelford: no dataSan Jacinto: no dataKendall: no dataWharton: no dataFloyd: no dataKarnes: no dataKaufman: no dataDuval: no dataJohnson: no dataFranklin: no dataEdwards: no dataWaller: 16,333 votes · Jane Bland 63.2% (10,330) · Gordon Goodman 36.8% (6,003) · 4,327 net for leaderMaverick: no dataKleberg: no dataGaines: no dataMartin: no dataBowie: no dataAndrews: no dataPotter: no dataGarza: no dataCaldwell: no dataParmer: no dataTitus: no dataTerry: no dataFoard: no dataReal: no dataCarson: no dataKnox: no dataHays: no dataMedina: no dataMotley: no dataWichita: no dataMidland: no dataVictoria: no dataTyler: no dataFalls: no dataPresidio: no dataWillacy: no dataLubbock: no dataHenderson: no dataWalker: no dataGalveston: 111,272 votes · Jane Bland 62.5% (69,492) · Gordon Goodman 37.5% (41,780) · 27,712 net for leaderHarris: 1,187,403 votes · Jane Bland 45.5% (540,005) · Gordon Goodman 54.5% (647,398) · 107,393 net for leaderDawson: no dataPecos: no dataNacogdoches: no dataGuadalupe: no dataTarrant: no dataJackson: no dataSwisher: no dataSterling: no dataWinkler: no dataFrio: no dataLipscomb: no dataCollingsworth: no dataColorado: 7,384 votes · Jane Bland 77.0% (5,689) · Gordon Goodman 23.0% (1,695) · 3,994 net for leaderWise: no dataGlasscock: no dataShelby: no dataComanche: no dataBurnet: no dataGray: no dataHudspeth: no dataCass: no dataEllis: no dataCooke: no dataWilliamson: no dataCochran: no dataVan Zandt: no dataDonley: no dataJones: no dataGrimes: 8,476 votes · Jane Bland 76.8% (6,508) · Gordon Goodman 23.2% (1,968) · 4,540 net for leaderIrion: no dataNavarro: no dataBrooks: no dataDallam: no dataHunt: no dataMitchell: no dataWood: no dataChildress: no dataJeff Davis: no dataMontague: no dataBrown: no dataHaskell: no dataFisher: no dataConcho: no dataCoke: no dataPolk: no dataCottle: no dataYoung: no dataLee: no dataCherokee: no dataHall: no dataHood: no dataArcher: no dataBaylor: no dataSan Augustine: no dataMadison: no dataMilam: no dataReeves: no dataNueces: no dataCamp: no dataFreestone: no dataRunnels: no dataTerrell: no dataDeaf Smith: no dataMarion: no dataLiberty: no dataJasper: no dataHansford: no dataChambers: 14,886 votes · Jane Bland 82.0% (12,201) · Gordon Goodman 18.0% (2,685) · 9,516 net for leaderHardin: no dataCollin: no dataBrazoria: 109,799 votes · Jane Bland 61.6% (67,646) · Gordon Goodman 38.4% (42,153) · 25,493 net for leaderThrockmorton: no dataBastrop: no dataScurry: no dataEctor: no dataLimestone: no dataDenton: no dataRed River: no dataMatagorda: no dataHardeman: no dataPalo Pinto: no dataLive Oak: no dataSherman: no dataUvalde: no dataBailey: no dataCulberson: no dataAtascosa: no dataWilson: no dataStarr: no dataDallas: no dataKimble: no dataMcCulloch: no dataCrockett: no dataHill: no dataKent: no dataEl Paso: no dataLoving: no dataDickens: no dataLa Salle: no dataLamb: no dataAustin: 10,750 votes · Jane Bland 80.9% (8,693) · Gordon Goodman 19.1% (2,057) · 6,636 net for leaderHutchinson: no dataVal Verde: no dataSmith: no dataRobertson: no dataGillespie: no dataKing: no dataTom Green: no dataYoakum: no dataSomervell: no dataKenedy: no dataBorden: no dataSan Saba: no dataBurleson: no dataBee: no dataTrinity: no dataCastro: no dataBrewster: no dataGregg: no dataWard: no dataWilbarger: no dataHamilton: no dataStephens: no dataLavaca: no dataBosque: no dataGoliad: no dataRoberts: no dataCallahan: no dataRains: no dataMorris: no dataLampasas: no dataUpshur: no dataWheeler: no dataSan Patricio: no dataMoore: no dataWebb: no dataBlanco: no dataNewton: no dataHockley: no dataPanola: no dataAnderson: no dataCameron: no dataMontgomery: no dataLlano: no dataMason: no dataTaylor: no dataHartley: no dataJim Wells: no dataZapata: no dataTravis: no dataHoward: no dataEl PasoAmarilloLubbockOdessaSan AngeloDallasTylerAustinHoustonSan AntonioCorpus ChristiMcAllen
Hue = county leader · Saturation = √(net margin / max county margin)
Noted (8)
  • Underperform9.3
    CHAMBERS
    Gordon Goodman's margin -63.9pp vs statewide +1.9pp
  • Underperform7.6
    AUSTIN
    Gordon Goodman's margin -61.7pp vs statewide +1.9pp
  • Underperform7.5
    WASHINGTON
    Gordon Goodman's margin -55.0pp vs statewide +1.9pp
  • Underperform5.9
    GRIMES
    Gordon Goodman's margin -53.6pp vs statewide +1.9pp
  • Underperform5.6
    COLORADO
    Gordon Goodman's margin -54.1pp vs statewide +1.9pp
  • Underperform5.4
    GALVESTON
    Gordon Goodman's margin -24.9pp vs statewide +1.9pp
  • Underperform5.0
    BRAZORIA
    Gordon Goodman's margin -23.2pp vs statewide +1.9pp
  • Underperform4.2
    WALLER
    Gordon Goodman's margin -26.5pp vs statewide +1.9pp

County results — early vs Election Day

  • AUSTIN10,750 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 2,0572,057
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 8,6938,693
  • BRAZORIA109,799 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 42,15342,153
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 67,64667,646
  • CHAMBERS14,886 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 2,6852,685
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 12,20112,201
  • COLORADO7,384 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 1,6951,695
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 5,6895,689
  • FORT BEND250,763 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 132,403132,403
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 118,360118,360
  • GALVESTON111,272 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 41,78041,780
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 69,49269,492
  • GRIMES8,476 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 1,9681,968
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 6,5086,508
  • HARRIS1,187,403 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 647,398647,398
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 540,005540,005
  • WALLER16,333 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 6,0036,003
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 10,33010,330
  • WASHINGTON13,102 total
    GoodmanEarly 0 · E-day 2,9492,949
    BlandEarly 0 · E-day 10,15310,153