★
TXElectionResults.com
← 2020 NOVEMBER 3RD GENERAL ELECTION

STATE SENATOR, DISTRICT 24

⚠ 10
Final Results·380,370 ballots cast
DAWN BUCKINGHAMI
69.5%264,517
CLAYTON TUCKER
30.5%115,853
Early vote vs Election Day

DAWN BUCKINGHAM gained 7.5 percentage points on Election Day.

DAWN BUCKINGHAM+7.5pp on E-day
Early 218,180 (82.5%)E-day 46,337 (17.5%)
CLAYTON TUCKER-7.5pp on E-day
Early 101,096 (87.3%)E-day 14,757 (12.7%)
Race totals380,370 ballots
Early 319,276 (83.9%)E-day 61,094 (16.1%)
Menard: no dataHale: no dataArmstrong: no dataCalhoun: no dataClay: no dataOrange: no dataGonzales: no dataFannin: no dataKerr: 26,970 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 78.5% (21,171) · CLAYTON TUCKER 21.5% (5,799) · 15,372 net for leaderRefugio: no dataJim Hogg: no dataDimmit: no dataNolan: no dataBrazos: no dataJefferson: no dataBell: 125,540 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 56.9% (71,465) · CLAYTON TUCKER 43.1% (54,075) · 17,390 net for leaderBandera: 12,265 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 81.5% (9,995) · CLAYTON TUCKER 18.5% (2,270) · 7,725 net for leaderHidalgo: no dataSchleicher: no dataGrayson: no dataCrosby: no dataDelta: no dataZavala: no dataRockwall: no dataEastland: no dataDeWitt: no dataAngelina: no dataMcLennan: no dataLamar: no dataLeon: no dataStonewall: no dataMcMullen: no dataSutton: no dataFort Bend: no dataParker: no dataKinney: no dataFayette: no dataBriscoe: no dataHarrison: no dataReagan: no dataColeman: no dataOchiltree: no dataCrane: no dataWashington: no dataLynn: no dataMills: 2,432 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 89.8% (2,185) · CLAYTON TUCKER 10.2% (247) · 1,938 net for leaderOldham: no dataSabine: no dataHopkins: no dataHouston: no dataBexar: no dataUpton: no dataErath: no dataRandall: no dataRusk: no dataCoryell: 22,856 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 68.8% (15,730) · CLAYTON TUCKER 31.2% (7,126) · 8,604 net for leaderComal: no dataAransas: no dataJack: no dataHemphill: no dataShackelford: no dataSan Jacinto: no dataKendall: no dataWharton: no dataFloyd: no dataKarnes: no dataKaufman: no dataDuval: no dataJohnson: no dataFranklin: no dataEdwards: no dataWaller: no dataMaverick: no dataKleberg: no dataGaines: no dataMartin: no dataBowie: no dataAndrews: no dataPotter: no dataGarza: no dataCaldwell: no dataParmer: no dataTitus: no dataTerry: no dataFoard: no dataReal: no dataCarson: no dataKnox: no dataHays: no dataMedina: no dataMotley: no dataWichita: no dataMidland: no dataVictoria: no dataTyler: no dataFalls: no dataPresidio: no dataWillacy: no dataLubbock: no dataHenderson: no dataWalker: no dataGalveston: no dataHarris: no dataDawson: no dataPecos: no dataNacogdoches: no dataGuadalupe: no dataTarrant: no dataJackson: no dataSwisher: no dataSterling: no dataWinkler: no dataFrio: no dataLipscomb: no dataCollingsworth: no dataColorado: no dataWise: no dataGlasscock: no dataShelby: no dataComanche: 5,848 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 86.0% (5,032) · CLAYTON TUCKER 14.0% (816) · 4,216 net for leaderBurnet: 23,991 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 78.7% (18,891) · CLAYTON TUCKER 21.3% (5,100) · 13,791 net for leaderGray: no dataHudspeth: no dataCass: no dataEllis: no dataCooke: no dataWilliamson: no dataCochran: no dataVan Zandt: no dataDonley: no dataJones: no dataGrimes: no dataIrion: no dataNavarro: no dataBrooks: no dataDallam: no dataHunt: no dataMitchell: no dataWood: no dataChildress: no dataJeff Davis: no dataMontague: no dataBrown: 15,517 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 87.3% (13,542) · CLAYTON TUCKER 12.7% (1,975) · 11,567 net for leaderHaskell: no dataFisher: no dataConcho: no dataCoke: no dataPolk: no dataCottle: no dataYoung: no dataLee: no dataCherokee: no dataHall: no dataHood: no dataArcher: no dataBaylor: no dataSan Augustine: no dataMadison: no dataMilam: no dataReeves: no dataNueces: no dataCamp: no dataFreestone: no dataRunnels: no dataTerrell: no dataDeaf Smith: no dataMarion: no dataLiberty: no dataJasper: no dataHansford: no dataChambers: no dataHardin: no dataCollin: no dataBrazoria: no dataThrockmorton: no dataBastrop: no dataScurry: no dataEctor: no dataLimestone: no dataDenton: no dataRed River: no dataMatagorda: no dataHardeman: no dataPalo Pinto: no dataLive Oak: no dataSherman: no dataUvalde: no dataBailey: no dataCulberson: no dataAtascosa: no dataWilson: no dataStarr: no dataDallas: no dataKimble: no dataMcCulloch: no dataCrockett: no dataHill: no dataKent: no dataEl Paso: no dataLoving: no dataDickens: no dataLa Salle: no dataLamb: no dataAustin: no dataHutchinson: no dataVal Verde: no dataSmith: no dataRobertson: no dataGillespie: 15,365 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 82.0% (12,601) · CLAYTON TUCKER 18.0% (2,764) · 9,837 net for leaderKing: no dataTom Green: no dataYoakum: no dataSomervell: no dataKenedy: no dataBorden: no dataSan Saba: 2,540 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 89.4% (2,270) · CLAYTON TUCKER 10.6% (270) · 2,000 net for leaderBurleson: no dataBee: no dataTrinity: no dataCastro: no dataBrewster: no dataGregg: no dataWard: no dataWilbarger: no dataHamilton: 4,133 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 86.2% (3,561) · CLAYTON TUCKER 13.8% (572) · 2,989 net for leaderStephens: no dataLavaca: no dataBosque: no dataGoliad: no dataRoberts: no dataCallahan: 6,625 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 90.0% (5,965) · CLAYTON TUCKER 10.0% (660) · 5,305 net for leaderRains: no dataMorris: no dataLampasas: 10,264 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 80.5% (8,265) · CLAYTON TUCKER 19.5% (1,999) · 6,266 net for leaderUpshur: no dataWheeler: no dataSan Patricio: no dataMoore: no dataWebb: no dataBlanco: 7,322 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 75.4% (5,524) · CLAYTON TUCKER 24.6% (1,798) · 3,726 net for leaderNewton: no dataHockley: no dataPanola: no dataAnderson: no dataCameron: no dataMontgomery: no dataLlano: 12,273 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 81.8% (10,037) · CLAYTON TUCKER 18.2% (2,236) · 7,801 net for leaderMason: no dataTaylor: 41,700 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 77.4% (32,268) · CLAYTON TUCKER 22.6% (9,432) · 22,836 net for leaderHartley: no dataJim Wells: no dataZapata: no dataTravis: 44,729 votes · DAWN BUCKINGHAM 58.2% (26,015) · CLAYTON TUCKER 41.8% (18,714) · 7,301 net for leaderHoward: no dataEl PasoAmarilloLubbockOdessaSan AngeloDallasTylerAustinHoustonSan AntonioCorpus ChristiMcAllen
Hue = county leader · Saturation = √(net margin / max county margin)
Noted (10)
  • Crossover9.7
    TRAVIS
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM (REP) won a county with 29.2% REP lean
  • Underperform5.0
    BELL
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM's margin +13.9pp vs statewide +39.1pp
  • Underperform4.6
    TRAVIS
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM's margin +16.3pp vs statewide +39.1pp
  • Landslide4.1
    BROWN
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM won by +74.5pp vs statewide +39.1pp
  • Landslide3.1
    CALLAHAN
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM won by +80.1pp vs statewide +39.1pp
  • Swing outlier2.5
    TRAVIS
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM shifted +15.3pp early→E-day vs +7.5pp statewide (2.1σ outlier)
  • Landslide2.3
    COMANCHE
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM won by +72.1pp vs statewide +39.1pp
  • Landslide2.0
    HAMILTON
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM won by +72.3pp vs statewide +39.1pp
  • Landslide1.8
    MILLS
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM won by +79.7pp vs statewide +39.1pp
  • Landslide1.8
    SAN SABA
    DAWN BUCKINGHAM won by +78.7pp vs statewide +39.1pp

County results — early vs Election Day

  • BANDERA12,265 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 8,627 · E-day 1,3689,995
    TUCKEREarly 2,076 · E-day 1942,270
  • BELL125,540 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 56,837 · E-day 14,62871,465
    TUCKEREarly 45,834 · E-day 8,24154,075
  • BLANCO7,322 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 4,704 · E-day 8205,524
    TUCKEREarly 1,643 · E-day 1551,798
  • BROWN15,517 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 10,614 · E-day 2,92813,542
    TUCKEREarly 1,584 · E-day 3911,975
  • BURNET23,991 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 15,837 · E-day 3,05418,891
    TUCKEREarly 4,435 · E-day 6655,100
  • CALLAHAN6,625 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 4,790 · E-day 1,1755,965
    TUCKEREarly 553 · E-day 107660
  • COMANCHE5,848 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 3,849 · E-day 1,1835,032
    TUCKEREarly 649 · E-day 167816
  • CORYELL22,856 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 12,747 · E-day 2,98315,730
    TUCKEREarly 6,094 · E-day 1,0327,126
  • GILLESPIE15,365 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 9,865 · E-day 2,73612,601
    TUCKEREarly 2,441 · E-day 3232,764
  • HAMILTON4,133 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 2,663 · E-day 8983,561
    TUCKEREarly 458 · E-day 114572
  • KERR26,970 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 18,270 · E-day 2,90121,171
    TUCKEREarly 5,149 · E-day 6505,799
  • LAMPASAS10,264 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 6,802 · E-day 1,4638,265
    TUCKEREarly 1,737 · E-day 2621,999
  • LLANO12,273 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 8,905 · E-day 1,13210,037
    TUCKEREarly 2,062 · E-day 1742,236
  • MILLS2,432 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 1,690 · E-day 4952,185
    TUCKEREarly 207 · E-day 40247
  • SAN SABA2,540 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 1,624 · E-day 6462,270
    TUCKEREarly 208 · E-day 62270
  • TAYLOR41,700 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 26,696 · E-day 5,57232,268
    TUCKEREarly 8,151 · E-day 1,2819,432
  • TRAVIS44,729 total
    BUCKINGHAMEarly 23,660 · E-day 2,35526,015
    TUCKEREarly 17,815 · E-day 89918,714
← Back to 2020 NOVEMBER 3RD GENERAL ELECTION