★
TXElectionResults.com
← 2020 MARCH 3RD REPUBLICAN PRIMARY

DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 100TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

⚠ 1
RepublicanFinal Results·4,530 ballots cast
LUKE MCLEAN INMANI
80.4%3,642
BRYAN DAVID DENHAM
19.6%888
Early vote vs Election Day

LUKE MCLEAN INMAN gained 80.4 percentage points on Election Day.

LUKE MCLEAN INMAN+80.4pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 3,642 (100.0%)
BRYAN DAVID DENHAM+19.6pp on E-day
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 888 (100.0%)
Race totals4,530 ballots
Early 0 (0.0%)E-day 4,530 (100.0%)
Menard: no dataHale: no dataArmstrong: no dataCalhoun: no dataClay: no dataOrange: no dataGonzales: no dataFannin: no dataKerr: no dataRefugio: no dataJim Hogg: no dataDimmit: no dataNolan: no dataBrazos: no dataJefferson: no dataBell: no dataBandera: no dataHidalgo: no dataSchleicher: no dataGrayson: no dataCrosby: no dataDelta: no dataZavala: no dataRockwall: no dataEastland: no dataDeWitt: no dataAngelina: no dataMcLennan: no dataLamar: no dataLeon: no dataStonewall: no dataMcMullen: no dataSutton: no dataFort Bend: no dataParker: no dataKinney: no dataFayette: no dataBriscoe: no dataHarrison: no dataReagan: no dataColeman: no dataOchiltree: no dataCrane: no dataWashington: no dataLynn: no dataMills: no dataOldham: no dataSabine: no dataHopkins: no dataHouston: no dataBexar: no dataUpton: no dataErath: no dataRandall: no dataRusk: no dataCoryell: no dataComal: no dataAransas: no dataJack: no dataHemphill: no dataShackelford: no dataSan Jacinto: no dataKendall: no dataWharton: no dataFloyd: no dataKarnes: no dataKaufman: no dataDuval: no dataJohnson: no dataFranklin: no dataEdwards: no dataWaller: no dataMaverick: no dataKleberg: no dataGaines: no dataMartin: no dataBowie: no dataAndrews: no dataPotter: no dataGarza: no dataCaldwell: no dataParmer: no dataTitus: no dataTerry: no dataFoard: no dataReal: no dataCarson: 1,401 votes · BRYAN DAVID DENHAM 30.2% (423) · LUKE MCLEAN INMAN 69.8% (978) · 555 net for leaderKnox: no dataHays: no dataMedina: no dataMotley: no dataWichita: no dataMidland: no dataVictoria: no dataTyler: no dataFalls: no dataPresidio: no dataWillacy: no dataLubbock: no dataHenderson: no dataWalker: no dataGalveston: no dataHarris: no dataDawson: no dataPecos: no dataNacogdoches: no dataGuadalupe: no dataTarrant: no dataJackson: no dataSwisher: no dataSterling: no dataWinkler: no dataFrio: no dataLipscomb: no dataCollingsworth: 711 votes · BRYAN DAVID DENHAM 9.8% (70) · LUKE MCLEAN INMAN 90.2% (641) · 571 net for leaderColorado: no dataWise: no dataGlasscock: no dataShelby: no dataComanche: no dataBurnet: no dataGray: no dataHudspeth: no dataCass: no dataEllis: no dataCooke: no dataWilliamson: no dataCochran: no dataVan Zandt: no dataDonley: 723 votes · BRYAN DAVID DENHAM 17.4% (126) · LUKE MCLEAN INMAN 82.6% (597) · 471 net for leaderJones: no dataGrimes: no dataIrion: no dataNavarro: no dataBrooks: no dataDallam: no dataHunt: no dataMitchell: no dataWood: no dataChildress: 1,250 votes · BRYAN DAVID DENHAM 14.1% (176) · LUKE MCLEAN INMAN 85.9% (1,074) · 898 net for leaderJeff Davis: no dataMontague: no dataBrown: no dataHaskell: no dataFisher: no dataConcho: no dataCoke: no dataPolk: no dataCottle: no dataYoung: no dataLee: no dataCherokee: no dataHall: 445 votes · BRYAN DAVID DENHAM 20.9% (93) · LUKE MCLEAN INMAN 79.1% (352) · 259 net for leaderHood: no dataArcher: no dataBaylor: no dataSan Augustine: no dataMadison: no dataMilam: no dataReeves: no dataNueces: no dataCamp: no dataFreestone: no dataRunnels: no dataTerrell: no dataDeaf Smith: no dataMarion: no dataLiberty: no dataJasper: no dataHansford: no dataChambers: no dataHardin: no dataCollin: no dataBrazoria: no dataThrockmorton: no dataBastrop: no dataScurry: no dataEctor: no dataLimestone: no dataDenton: no dataRed River: no dataMatagorda: no dataHardeman: no dataPalo Pinto: no dataLive Oak: no dataSherman: no dataUvalde: no dataBailey: no dataCulberson: no dataAtascosa: no dataWilson: no dataStarr: no dataDallas: no dataKimble: no dataMcCulloch: no dataCrockett: no dataHill: no dataKent: no dataEl Paso: no dataLoving: no dataDickens: no dataLa Salle: no dataLamb: no dataAustin: no dataHutchinson: no dataVal Verde: no dataSmith: no dataRobertson: no dataGillespie: no dataKing: no dataTom Green: no dataYoakum: no dataSomervell: no dataKenedy: no dataBorden: no dataSan Saba: no dataBurleson: no dataBee: no dataTrinity: no dataCastro: no dataBrewster: no dataGregg: no dataWard: no dataWilbarger: no dataHamilton: no dataStephens: no dataLavaca: no dataBosque: no dataGoliad: no dataRoberts: no dataCallahan: no dataRains: no dataMorris: no dataLampasas: no dataUpshur: no dataWheeler: no dataSan Patricio: no dataMoore: no dataWebb: no dataBlanco: no dataNewton: no dataHockley: no dataPanola: no dataAnderson: no dataCameron: no dataMontgomery: no dataLlano: no dataMason: no dataTaylor: no dataHartley: no dataJim Wells: no dataZapata: no dataTravis: no dataHoward: no dataEl PasoAmarilloLubbockOdessaSan AngeloDallasTylerAustinHoustonSan AntonioCorpus ChristiMcAllen
Hue = county leader · Saturation = √(net margin / max county margin)
Noted (1)
  • Underperform0.9
    CARSON
    LUKE MCLEAN INMAN's margin +39.6pp vs statewide +60.8pp

County results — early vs Election Day

  • CARSON1,401 total
    INMANEarly 0 · E-day 978978
    DENHAMEarly 0 · E-day 423423
  • CHILDRESS1,250 total
    INMANEarly 0 · E-day 1,0741,074
    DENHAMEarly 0 · E-day 176176
  • COLLINGSWORTH711 total
    INMANEarly 0 · E-day 641641
    DENHAMEarly 0 · E-day 7070
  • DONLEY723 total
    INMANEarly 0 · E-day 597597
    DENHAMEarly 0 · E-day 126126
  • HALL445 total
    INMANEarly 0 · E-day 352352
    DENHAMEarly 0 · E-day 9393
← Back to 2020 MARCH 3RD REPUBLICAN PRIMARY